TL;DR
The best way to choose your next digital product is to study behavior, not guesses. Use conversion analytics to track clicks, signups, bookings, and purchases, then look for repeated high-intent patterns before you build.
Most creators build their next product based on vibes, comments, or one DM that felt weirdly convincing. I’ve done that too, and it usually leads to too much work for too little revenue.
The better move is simpler: watch what people already do. Conversion analytics tells you which problem your audience is trying to solve with their clicks, signups, downloads, and bookings.
A lot of product ideas sound smart in your head and flop the second they hit your profile.
That’s usually not because your audience is “bad” or because the market is impossible. It’s because you measured attention when you should’ve measured intent.
Likes are loose signals. Replies are a little better. But when someone clicks a product card, joins a waitlist, downloads a free resource, or books paid time, they’re telling you something much more useful: what they believe is worth action.
According to Mixpanel’s guide to conversion analysis, conversion analysis is used to track the actions that matter to business outcomes, not just surface-level activity. That’s the lens you want when you’re deciding what to build next.
This is where a conversion-focused profile matters. Standard link-in-bio pages mostly push visitors outward, one click at a time. Oho is built differently: the page is meant to help people act directly by buying, booking, subscribing, or sending a structured inquiry from one place. That’s important because better on-page action gives you better signal quality.
If you’re trying to decide between a template pack, a mini-course, a swipe file, a workshop replay, or a paid consultation offer, don’t start by asking, “What could I make?”
Start by asking, “What are people already trying to do on my page?”
That’s my practical stance here: don’t ask your audience what they’d buy before you study what they’re already attempting to buy. Polls are cheap. Behavior is expensive. Expensive signals are better.
When I need to choose the next offer, I use a simple 4-part filter: traffic source, action taken, friction point, and revenue adjacency.
I call it the conversion evidence review process because that’s really what it is. You’re reviewing evidence, not brainstorming in a vacuum.
Not all traffic is equally useful.
A viral post can dump a lot of people onto your page who were curious for six seconds and left. A smaller stream from search, email, a niche podcast, or a recurring content format often converts better because the visitor already understands the problem you’re solving.
Google Analytics is designed to help you understand the customer journey and improve ROI. In practice, that means you should separate broad awareness traffic from high-intent traffic before you draw product conclusions.
If 2,000 people visit from a broad social post and almost nobody clicks your paid resource, that doesn’t mean the offer is bad. It may just mean the traffic was shallow.
If 180 people visit from a tutorial thread and 23 of them click the same product category, that’s a much stronger signal.
You need a small set of meaningful actions.
As documented in Google’s GA4 conversion help, a conversion is created from an event, which lets you consistently measure important actions. For creators, those events don’t need to be fancy.
They can be things like:
The mistake I see all the time is tracking page views and calling it insight.
A page view tells you what got seen. A conversion event tells you what got taken seriously.
This is the part most people skip.
You don’t just want to know that 54 people clicked. You want to know what happened between click and commitment.
According to UXCam’s conversion analytics overview, analyzing conversions between two actions over time helps reveal user flow and friction points. That’s useful even if your funnel is tiny.
For example:
That doesn’t automatically mean the template idea is weak. It could mean pricing felt off, the sales copy was vague, the delivery promise was confusing, or the page pushed them away too early.
I’ve seen creators kill good product ideas because they only looked at purchases, not the drop-off shape.
A steep drop between click and checkout usually points to offer clarity.
A steep drop between checkout start and purchase often points to price, trust, or payment friction.
This is my favorite filter because it helps you avoid building random side quests.
Revenue adjacency means asking: if this free or low-ticket action converts well, what paid product logically sits next to it?
If people keep downloading your content calendar, maybe they want a more complete planning system.
If they keep booking short advice sessions, maybe they want a packaged audit or premium template bundle. If that’s your lane, there’s a useful overlap with booked paid time and product demand, because questions people pay to ask often become products other people will pay to self-serve.
If people subscribe after reading your tutorial posts about a niche tool, a mini-course might outperform a generic ebook. We’ve seen that pattern enough that it’s worth thinking through mini-course offers before you default to another PDF.
You do not need enterprise analytics for this. You need clean instrumentation and a page that gives visitors meaningful choices.
The baseline setup is pretty straightforward.
If you’re starting from scratch, I would track these before anything else:
That gives you enough to compare attention, interest, and commitment.
According to Piwik PRO’s definition of conversion rate, conversion rates measure specific actions such as completing a purchase or downloading an ebook. That sounds basic, but it’s exactly the reminder creators need: define the action first, then measure the rate.
One reason conversion analytics gets messy is because the page itself is messy.
If your profile has twelve links with overlapping promises, your data won’t tell you much. It will only tell you that confused people clicked random stuff.
Each offer block should answer one clean question:
On Oho, that matters because your public page is supposed to act like a monetization layer, not a prettier list of exits. The cleaner the action paths, the easier it is to read the demand signal behind them.
This sounds boring, but it’s the difference between usable data and a dashboard graveyard.
Name events by topic and action. For example:
When you come back in 30 days, you’ll know what happened without decoding your own chaos.
This is where conversion analytics starts paying rent.
Every week, run a short review. Not a huge dashboard session. Just 20 to 30 minutes with the same questions.
Pull one week, two weeks, and 30-day views if you have enough traffic. Then review:
That review gives you a ranked list of what your audience is leaning toward.
Here’s a real-world style example of how I’d read it.
Baseline: A creator has three visible paths on their profile: a free pitch template, a paid content planner, and a 20-minute strategy session.
Over 30 days:
Intervention: Instead of building a generic course on “creator business,” the creator builds a narrow digital product: a productized offer toolkit for creators who need to package services and digital products.
Expected outcome: Better conversion because the product sits directly between the high-intent session and the repeated pain point showing up in inquiries.
Timeframe: Test the new offer for 30 to 45 days against the old paid planner as a secondary offer.
Notice what happened there. We didn’t invent demand. We observed it.
That’s the difference between product creation and product extraction. Extraction is easier on your calendar and your bank account.
I usually want to see at least a few of these signals lining up before I greenlight a new product:
One signal can be noise.
Three signals together usually mean there’s a product hiding in plain sight.
I’ve made most of these myself, so this isn’t theoretical.
Traffic is useful, but only if it leads somewhere.
If a profile gets a lot of visits and very few meaningful actions, you don’t have product demand yet. You have awareness.
That’s why I prefer a small audience with measurable behavior over a big audience with flattering vanity metrics every single time.
When creators feel uncertain, they often build the most generic product they can think of.
Bad move.
Your best-selling product is often the one closest to a specific action pattern. If visitors keep engaging with one narrow pain point, build the narrow solution first.
Don’t build an “ultimate creator business guide” if your data says people keep clicking one specific resource about pricing, outreach, or content systems.
A lot of demand shows up before payment.
Waitlist joins, free downloads, paid session bookings, and collaboration inquiries can all point to what a future digital product should become. If someone repeatedly pays for your time to solve the same issue, productize that issue.
If bookings are part of your model, this also connects with paid time from your bio, because a clean booking path doesn’t just create revenue now. It reveals which transformation people are willing to pay for fast.
If you rewrite the headline, change the product name, move the CTA, raise the price, and swap the audience angle all in one week, your analytics won’t teach you much.
Change one important variable at a time.
That could be:
Then give it enough traffic to mean something.
This one is sneaky.
People say they want better conversion analytics, but what they really create is an endless habit of watching numbers move around.
Set a decision rule in advance.
Example: “If the waitlist for a topic gets more qualified signups than our other lead magnets over 30 days, and at least 10% of those visitors click through to a paid preview, we will build the first version of the product.”
No invented benchmarks. Just a clear internal threshold.
If your public page is where most discovery happens, your product research should start there too.
Oho is best framed as the monetization and conversion layer for a creator’s public profile. That means the profile isn’t just where traffic lands. It’s where demand leaves clues.
Here’s how I’d structure the page when the goal is to learn what to build next.
That usually means:
This is not about stuffing the page. It’s about creating readable behavior.
If visitors click the free pricing checklist and then join the waitlist for a pricing toolkit, that’s a signal.
If they skip the checklist but book a quick audit, that’s a different signal.
If they ignore both but subscribe to your newsletter from content about brand deals, that’s another direction entirely.
For creators trying to turn sporadic work into predictable income, service and product behavior often overlap more than they expect. That’s one reason the logic behind recurring creator retainers can be useful here too: recurring work often exposes the exact repeated tasks that should become templates, guides, or mini-products.
Your CTA copy matters because it changes who clicks.
“Download now” is vague.
“Get the 12-email sponsorship pitch pack” is better.
“Join the waitlist for the creator pricing calculator” is better again if you’re validating a future product.
More specific CTAs create cleaner conversion analytics because they pre-qualify intent before the action happens.
This is a small but important shift.
Don’t only ask whether ebooks beat mini-courses or templates beat workshops.
Ask whether the topic beats the topic next to it.
A mediocre format on a hot problem often outperforms a polished format on a weak problem.
I’ve watched creators spend weeks debating delivery type when the real issue was that nobody cared enough about the problem being packaged.
Less than you think, as long as the signals are high intent.
You do not need massive traffic. If a small number of visitors repeatedly take meaningful actions around the same problem, that’s often enough to test a lightweight first version.
That usually means one of three things: the problem is real but the paid offer is wrong, the transition from free to paid is weak, or the audience trusts your free help more than your paid framing.
In that case, build the bridge first. A tripwire, mini-product, paid AMA, or tightly scoped template can close the gap better than a giant course.
Sure, but use surveys after behavior, not before it.
Behavior tells you where interest exists. Surveys help you understand wording, objections, and format preferences inside that area of interest.
Absolutely.
If people consistently book time to solve one narrow issue, there’s a decent chance other people would pay for a self-serve version of that solution. That’s one of the fastest ways to find product-market clues without guessing.
Then your data is probably more fragmented than it needs to be.
This is exactly the problem Oho is trying to solve compared with a standard link list. When buying, booking, subscribing, and inquiring happen from one conversion-focused page, you get cleaner action data and a stronger sense of what’s actually working.
You don’t need a perfect analytics stack to make better product decisions. You need a page with clear choices, a short list of tracked actions, and the discipline to study behavior before you build. If you want a simpler place to sell, book, grow, and learn from what converts, Oho gives you a cleaner way to do that from one profile.
What are visitors already trying to buy from you that you haven’t packaged yet?
